Sponsored Programs
Internal Grant Final Reports
Final Reports Submitted During the Spring Semester of 2007:
Joyce Chang, Dawna Buchanan (Butterfield), Ann Powell-Brown, Uzziel Pecina and Yuankun Yao
Chad King
James Loch
Duane Lundervold
Mary McCord & Larry Michaelsen
Joseph Ryan
Kim Stark-Wroblewski
Joyce Chang, Dawna Buchanan (Butterfield), Ann Powell-Brown, Uzziel Pecina and Yuankun Yao |
Grant Activity Summary This grant has been extremely helpful. Our team works well together and has regular communication about the project. Working on this project has been a wonderful learning experience for all of us. Due to the assistance of the grant money, we were able to purchase our research materials and supporting resources. Grant money was used wisely and carefully. As a result, we have one published article and two conference presentations. If you need additional information, please feel free to contact Joyce Chang. We will continue to work on the second phase of our research project. Thank you very much for supporting our team. Productivity - Result (… as April 18, 2007) 2. One Journal Article Publication 3. One International Conference Paper accepted. (October 2007, Vancouver, Canada) We will continue to work on this project. Please continue to support our team in the future. Thank you! |
Chad King |
Introduction: Species Mean total length Mean tail length Mean mass Discussion |
James Loch |
'Refinement of the Middle-Lower Ordovician Boundary at Whiterock Canyon, Nevada' (19SM014) Introduction: The primary goal of this grant proposal was to establish the distribution of trilobite fossils in a limestone and shale outcrop in Nevada. This outcrop, the Whiterock Canyon section, is the standard of reference (boundary stratotype) for the beginning of the Middle Ordovician, Whiterockian Series in North America. Ross and Ethington (1991) defined the base of the Whiterockian at the lowest (earliest) occurrence of the conodont microfossil Tripodus laevis. Ross and Ethington (1991) indicate that this horizon occurs in the lowest bed of the Antelope Valley Limestone. Subsequent work, however, has indicated that the lowest occurrence is in a limestone bed 8 feet (2.6m) lower in the section, within the underlying Ninemile Shale (Ethington, 1998, pers. comm.). Fortey (1980; Fortey and Droser, 1996) has maintained that a break in sediment deposition, a surface known as an unconformity, exists within the Whiterock Canyon section near the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis. . This suggestion is problematic because international procedures for the definition of series suggest that the reference sections should be without major breaks or unconformities (Salvatore, 1994). Seventeen trilobite-bearing collections produced through the funding of this proposal (Figure 1) have yielded at least 30 trilobite species, of which 5 are new. Preliminary analysis of this data indicated that trilobites known from the overlying Antelope Valley Limestone extended 30 feet (9.8m) below the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis and suggested that there was no evidence of an unconformity in this section near the beginning of the Whiterockian Series. As an internal check, however, I provided surplus limestone from each of my trilobite-bearing limestone to Ethington. He processed the samples for conodonts and found that my samples indicates that the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis occurred 30 feet (9.8m) below the lowest horizon from which it had previously been reported (Ethington, 2002-2003, pers. comm.). In subsequent discussions with Ethington we came to realize that we collected from slightly different areas of the canyon, although these were separated by less than 100 feet (32.8m). There are several interpretations possible for the inconsistency in the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis at Whitrock Canyon. 1) A hidden fault has dropped my samples to a position below the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis in Ethington’s samples. 2) My samples were collected from a channel incised into a muddy continental shelf and filled by local limestones. This may delineate the position of the unconformity that Fortey and Droser (1996) predicted the outset. 3) Ethington failed to recover the true lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis. If we were able to extend the distribution of this species lower in the section, closer to my distribution, we could accept that some incision had occurred, but suggest that there was no significant break in sedimentation present (no unconformity). I made a first attempt to resolve this inconsistency in May 2005 with funding from a UCM Mini-grant. I managed to recollect 4 collection horizons and added an additional new species to the list of those recovered from the section. Unfortunately, early in the second day in the field a severe thundersnow essentially made the 28.5 mile dirt road that is used to access the section unsafe for passage and forced me from the field. I have scheduled another attempt for May of 2007. Outcomes: I have presented on the trilobite distribution from the Whiterock Canyon section twice (Loch, 2002, 2003) before we realized that there is a problem with the conodont diatribution. During a sabbatical in the Fall Semester of 2004 I prepared the description of these trilobites for an eventual manuscript. Unfortunately, before I can complete and submit that manuscript I need to resolve the possible interpretations for the inconsistency in the lowest occurrence of Tripodus laevis. During the original fieldwork and subsequent visit I have taken UCM Geology majors along as field assistants. This opportunity has allowed each student to experience geological conditions unlike those found around Warrensburg and aided in their professional development. References: |
Duane Lundervold |
The funded research, "Experimental Analysis of Behavioral Relaxation Training," is a labor intensive project involving eight to 13, 45-minute sessions during which subjects are trained and assessed in relaxation skills. Assessment includes direct observation and physiological monitoring. Incentives for participants will be needed to conduct the research; however, additional funding from a different source will be required. |
| Mary McCord & Larry Michaelsen |
This grant was used to collect data for an experimental study of several potentially influential variables in Service Learning. It outcomes was a new instrument of “maturity”, and an assessment of the differences in experiential programs in a quantitative manner. This study expanded the knowledge of learning theory and instructional design significantly. In addition, it may serve to motivate more technology instructors to incorporate service learning in their curriculum. The abstract follows: Student Development in Service Learning: Constructing an Instrument Abstract: Key Words: The initial study was coauthored with Victoria Steel and submitted to the UCM Faculty Days Research in February 2005. The paper won first prize in the category ‘Instructional Technology, Service Learning and Scholarship of Teaching and Learning’. Additional data points were collected, and this paper was accepted and submitted at the Regional Campus Compact Conference June 26-28, 2006, “Empowering and Engaging our Campuses through Service & Learning” in Kansas City, Missouri.. Online data collection is continuing, for future submission to education/pedagogy journals. |
Joseph Ryan |
The present investigation examines the concurrent validity and level of agreement in terms of intellectual classification between the WISC-IV and the Otis-Lennon School Ability Test-Eighth Edition (OLSAT-8; Otis & Lennon, 2003). The OLSAT-8 measures the cognitive abilities of children from Kindergarten through 12th grade. It is a paper-and-pencil, teacher administered, group test that provides a Total score along with Verbal and Nonverbal part scores. Each raw score is converted into a School Ability Index (SAI) with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 16. The Total score is considered to be the best overall predictor of a child's school-learning ability. The OLSAT-8 assesses intellectual functions across seven levels via items that require identifying likenesses and differences, defining words, remembering numbers and words, establishing sequence, solving arithmetic problems, completing analogies, and following directions. The test was standardized in 2002 on a representative sample of American school children. Reliability coefficients range from .88 to .94 across 13 grade levels and 14 age groups. Table 2 presents correlations among the WISC-IV and OLSAT-8 variables. Significant relationships were demonstrated between the WISC-IV composites and both the OLSAT-Verbal and Total scores. The PRI and FSIQ were the only WISC-IV variables that were significantly associated with the OLSAT-Nonverbal score. The three coefficients between similar constructs (i.e., VCI vs. OLSAT Verbal, PRI vs. OLSAT-Nonverbal, and FSIQ vs. OLSAT Total) were significant at the .01 level. An unexpected finding was that the OLSAT-8 Verbal score correlated more highly with the PRI (r = .57) than with the VCI (r = .44). Note: The Stanford Achievement Test was administered to each participant, but I have not had an opportunity to analyze this material. Also, modified the protocol to include a return visit to retest some of the participants with the WISC-IV. Twenty-two children were tested. Unfortunately, I have not had time to analyze this data. |
Kim Stark-Wroblewski |
The following is a Final Project Summary Report for the study entitled “Late-Life Work Issues among Migrant Workers of Mexican Descent: An Exploratory Investigation,” which was supported by the University of Central Missouri’s Internal Grants Program [grant # KSWUA1]. Although 20% of the data was collected [i.e., 4 out of the hoped-for 20 interviews were completed], it was determined that it was not feasible to conduct this study in its entirety at this point in time. The primary reason for the study’s lack of feasibility centered around the difficulty in maintaining personnel who could conduct the interviews. That is, the population [Migrant workers of Mexican descent] is readily available in the area; however, the Primary Investigator was unable to find an individual, conversant in Spanish, who was available on an ongoing basis to conduct the interviews. Two individuals were contacted who indicated their interest in and ability to assist with the interviews, and both received training on the interview protocol, purposes of the study, etc. One of these individuals [person A] later became incapacitated due to family illness. The other individual [person B] conducted four [4] interviews and submitted the tapes of these to me; however, shortly thereafter, person B stopped responding to telephone calls, e-mail correspondence, etc., despite repeated statements that she was highly interested in, and wished to continue working on, the study. Thus, rather than risk purchasing additional equipment [e.g., translation software], in the absence of reliable personnel to assist with the study, data collection was halted. Despite the fact that the project did not exactly go as I had hoped, I actually learned a great deal about the grants process by doing this, and I certainly plan to submit for internal, as well as external, funding again in the future. I wish to thank the University Research Program Committee for granting me this opportunity, and regret that I was unable to complete the study at the present time. Additionally, I thank the University Research Program staff [including support staff] all of their assistance with funding issues related to this project. |









